Up next


45% Of Women Will Be Single & Childless By 2030 - MGTOW

331 Views
Published on 10 Feb 2023 / In People & Blogs

Sponsor Link:
Profit Specialist Group
video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5FV-morB_Ak
https://www.cashisking.cc/

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrH8IOBLLWM

Rumble: https://rumble.com/c/c-2039428
Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c
Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxeDBpkwsLT/

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com

Bitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv


Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video isn't brought to you by a donation. If you want to suggest a topic you can do so at the Subscribestar and Paypal links below. Also hit the like button to support the channel. Anyways, I found an article on Twitter called: "45% Of Women Are Expected To Be Single And Childless By 2030, Per Recent Projection" and I thought I'd cover it. Here's what part of the article has to say and I quote: "Recent data predicts that 45% of women between ages 25 and 44 will be single and childless by the time 2030 rolls around. The number of single women in the U.S. is expected to rise 1.2% every year. We're told by our culture that a woman who is unmarried and has no children is empowered and in charge of her own life. She has escaped the unnecessary burden of raising a family and being a slave to her husband. Sadly, many women have adopted the modern feminist lifestyle and have chosen to sleep around, abort their baby if they unexpectedly get pregnant, and swear off marriage. But these cultural trends are going to have a tremendous impact on the future of American society. In 2019, Morgan Stanley published an article outlining women's impact on the American economy. The number of "prime working-age women" in the U.S. has been increasing steadily, and most of them are single and completely focused on their career. These women will continue to have a greater representation in the workforce, helping to boost wages. Economist Ellen Zentner explained, “In the past, education or lower-paying occupational choices largely drove the pay gap. Today, motherhood is by far the largest contributor to the wage gap, since women who become mothers often choose to stop working or work fewer hours." But it looks like there will be fewer and fewer mothers over the next couple of decades as women choose to commit themselves to work rather than start a family. Single women spend more than the average family household, especially when it comes to travel, nightlife, eating out, skincare and beauty, retail shopping, etc. So of course economists will attempt to frame it in a positive light that nearly half of women are single and childless. It can only be good for the economy. However, few are considering the negative impact this will have on greater society. The birth replacement rate is already trending below replacement, and surveys show that women who are unmarried and childless tend to struggle more with mental illness and feelings of self-confidence. Single, childless women may be buying more things at the mall and traveling to various American cities, but at what cost in the long run? The bedrock of any healthy society is the nuclear family, and it's sad to think that we will see fewer and fewer families in the future— which of course means fewer children and happily married couples. Meanwhile, young women in their "prime working years" devote themselves to a career and a boss who doesn't truly care about them, have promiscuous sex that has a negative impact on their mental health, and miss out on the true, lifelong fulfillment that comes with being a wife and mother." unquote. Well it looks like the tradcucks are out there in full force trying to convince Whamen they should be having kids. Parts of this are completely wrong. Especially the part where they say that women in the workforce will boost wages. What what money magic is that? A greater representation of whamen in the workforce lowers wages because there are more people chasing the same jobs. That's good for employers and bad for employees. I'll discuss moe in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Profit Specialist Group:





10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.

Ad Photo Credits:

1. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-129764942/stoc

2. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-421296764/stoc

3. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-150989840/stoc

Show more
Responsive image

Log in to comment

SoloMan Zone
SoloMan Zone 2 years ago

45%???? this should be more like 85% as most now are not marriage or mother materials as they are all acting like whores

   5    0
Igor MGTOW And Video Games

I agree.

   3    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 2 years ago

Well, the good news is the 304 market is going to be flooded: So blowjobs for Big Macs will be a "high quality" date soon. Tell ya what babe, let's spice this up: I'll give you a Big Mac with large fries and two chicken chalupas.... for half an hour of your time for a quickie! You be living the High Rolla life now!

   2    0
Mgvember
Mgvember 2 years ago

Women go on these fucking monologues about 'big strong men' and who needs them.

You know what those monologues and this article have in common?

They both need us to give a fuck.

   3    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 2 years ago

Oh God, please no: I don't want to have to listen Vagina Monologues 3.1... fuck that!

   0    0
Mustang
Mustang 2 years ago

It doesn't matter. Most of us will be dead this Year due to a Thermo-Nuclear War with Communist China & Russia happening.

   2    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 2 years ago

No. I think you mean the clot shot: but good news, if these women wanted to get pregnat, they cwn not: The clot shot sterilized them.

   2    0
Dutch Cobbler
Dutch Cobbler 2 years ago

Was that meant to be a silver lining?

   2    0
sauger1001
sauger1001 2 years ago

@DutchCobbler: ROFLMAO! Sitting back, and watching the show.

   3    0
sauger1001
sauger1001 2 years ago

Not yet. I believe we're still in the "wars and rumors of wars" phase. JMO.

   0    0
Show more

0

Up next