Bitches in Ditches - they sink themselves - more info in the pinned comment.

Well it's a MUCH better answer than off the side of the packet. In order to get REALLY good answers off ChatGPT, you have to formulate words and sentences as a highly refined linguistic skills - like a chess grand master.... As a parallel - I can ask it, "How fast is a car?" - which to most people would generate the daily drive kind of an answer. But If I ask, "What is the fastes speed ever recorded for these three types of powered cars, being a piston engined car, a jet powered car, either a rocket and or a combined rocket and jet powered car - being the fastest ever recorded speed for a car?" --------- This is a completely different question. I will see what the answers are.

Question 1. Answer 1. The speed of a car can vary greatly depending on the make, model, and its intended purpose. Here are some general examples: 1. **Standard Cars**: Most everyday cars have top speeds ranging from 100 mph (160 km/h) to 130 mph (210 km/h). These speeds are more than sufficient for daily driving and obeying speed limits. 2. **Sports Cars**: High-performance cars, like a Ferrari, Porsche, or Lamborghini, can reach top speeds of 180 mph (290 km/h) or more. Some supercars even exceed 250 mph (400 km/h), like the Bugatti Chiron. 3. **Electric Cars**: Electric vehicles (EVs) such as the Tesla Model S have top speeds around 155 mph (250 km/h), with some models designed for high performance even higher. 4. **Formula 1 Cars**: Racing cars can reach extreme speeds, often exceeding 200 mph (320 km/h) on tracks, but their speed is optimized for track performance rather than everyday use. So, a car's speed depends on its design and purpose. Most consumer vehicles top out at speeds between 100-130 mph, while performance cars and racing vehicles can go much faster.

Question 2. Answer 2. ------------ Chat GPT fucked this up very badly.... I don't have time to do it, but question 2 needs to be broken up into three different questions and they need to be asked seperately - the AI cannot think, it just regurgitates data....

What is the fastes speed ever recorded for a piston engined car? -------------- The fastest speed ever recorded for a piston-engined car is 304.77 mph (490.48 km/h), achieved by the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+ in 2019. This speed was reached during a test run at the Ehra-Lessien test track in Germany. The Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+ is powered by a quad-turbocharged 8.0-liter W16 engine, and this record-breaking run made it the first production car to exceed 300 mph. This speed has not been surpassed by any other piston-powered car to date. However, it's worth noting that this record is for a production car. If we consider modified vehicles or cars designed specifically for speed records, the fastest piston-engined car could be different. But in terms of standard, commercially available vehicles, the Bugatti Chiron Super Sport 300+ holds the record.

Anyway..... The issues of Linux. It's a very good operating system. And a lot of the software as "free packages" with extras, are brilliant. AND there are some VERY sophiticated programs for 3D rendering that people make really good movies with.... as well as medical imaging programs.... MRI imaging etc. Not sure what is available but my magic vision tells me that radar imaging from transmitted and reflected signals can be sliced into layers based upon very fast timing of the views on the reflection times, and these can be developed like MRI imaging programs combined with 3D animation programs... So you get combinations of radar types - weather, rain, terrain, doppler etc., recombining into full colour real time imaging - essentially a 3D animated movie of the real world as your moving through it, based upon radar. I can tell you some of the programs but not right now I have work to do and can come back to this later.

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: This is fascinating. I was just thinking of rendering real time digital twins of radar sensor based events in Unreal Engine, but from what you're saying it gets even more complex with representing most of the physical world in a 3D engine based on near real time layered radar representation!

How much concurrent exposure can living systems take without getting cancer tho? I'm also interested in how the energy from such sensors interacts with living systems

@Longshanks: accidentally closed the page with 90% of the research done.... Ahem. The fast short version: https://www.blender.org/ and Medical MRI viewer... https://aeskulap.nongnu.org/ Uses a specific file type Diacom.... AND Inscape ---- Really sophisticated animators use it a lot..... https://inkscape.org/?about-screen=1 https://inkscape.org/gallery/ ----- I think it interoperates with Blender... And can do really good animation in it's own right. https://inkscape.org/search/?q=animate https://inkscape.org/~doctormo/%E2%98%85ferrari And the generic list: https://slashdot.org/software/animation/linux/

"How much concurrent exposure can living systems take without getting cancer tho?" --------- I dunno - if the night time cosmic and earth radiation levels, and the Class what ever Solar Flare / Coronial Mass Ejection - one of those was big enough to fuck with some satellites and not really reach the earth and fry people - probably pick a peak level that would be similar to the average peak levels of all radiation types, on an average sunny day at noon..... and then stick at or below that. We are bathed in radiation of all sorts all the time, just usually not much of it at all.

@Longshanks: https://studio.blender.org/films/ ------------ https://studio.blender.org/pro....jects/elephants-drea -------------- https://studio.blender.org/pro....jects/tears-of-steel

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: thanks for the info! Blender and Inkscape I am familiar with but that DICOM viewer looks interesting. How can I use it to generate images from radar you reckon?

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: looking at some stock DICOM/PACS resources...

@Longshanks: Hmmmmm - Well Hmmmmm CAT, MRI and PET scans and the machines that make them, and how they do the scans - I can visualise it.... I am one of those rare people that can walk in for the scans etc., look at the machine, see how it's operating and figure it all out almost immediately.... Well RADAR and distance measurement - that is the tiny fractions of difference in the sent beam to the received reflection - then there is the vertical alignment and the horizontal alignment - and the sweeping... AND then rating the signals to sort of point form - being the objects at different distances, and then adding attributes to the reflected signals based upon what the radar is capable of perceiving - like dirt, trees, water, rain, metal etc. - AND your going to need a FAST sweep, a VERY clever balance in the amount of data, and what you do need to see, vs what can be seen.... and discriminating accordingly. e.g. The mountains and valley - they are easy to fly through at night on radar alone - because they are big.... so the data density would be say one point every 5 or 10 square meters, Run some high pylons and steel power cables way up high in the air, your going to need a very high degree of sensitivity, and of image refresh rates and data processing speed to produce the images, for metallic structures other wise your just not going to see them and your going to fly straight through the towers and or wires... https://sun9-55.userapi.com/c9....09628/u352082339/d31 https://s0.geograph.org.uk/pho....tos/02/68/026855_122

@Longshanks: I can tell you HOW to do it, but I forget the code type that the MRI viewer runs on... It's sort of like calculus..... I understand it, and I can compute it, but I am not particularly brilliant at maths, because I don't do much of it. It's not that hard, but there is a lot in the combined issues of radar type/s beam shaping, the processing electronics, and the imaging equipment AND the software to run it all... https://yandex.com/images/search -------- colour terrain following radar ---------- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/....Terrain-following_ra ------------ https://media.kpfu.ru/sites/de....fault/files/styles/f ----------- https://www.asianmilitaryrevie....w.com/wp-content/upl ---------------- https://sun9-59.userapi.com/s/....v1/if2/jjEpvklRpOPto ---------- http://img.bemil.chosun.com/nb....rd/data/10044/upfile ------------- https://user-images.githubuser....content.com/98583912

@Longshanks: I can help some more - but your going to have to do all the cross configuration yourself - your system, components and objectives.... I can't speculate beyond this.

@Longshanks: This has a brief on these systems and many links at the bottom of the page. https://www.unmannedsystemstec....hnology.com/2024/12/

@Longshanks: https://www.unmannedsystemstec....hnology.com/company/

@Longshanks: I like learning all this stuff - but for everything I learn about - often there are like 10,000 other things to go with it..... You know so... the idea of being a genius is a bit abstract. So many clever people, so many specialists, so much knowledge and experience that other people have with so many other things....