Black People Don’t Exist (How We Should Categorize The Races)

My content is for those willing to listen, regardless I think it’s important talking about these things as many people can get a lot to learn. Even if 1% of Americans are willing to understand these concepts, that’s 3 million people

@HereticVII: Yeah I do that all the time, everytime i see a random person with a big nose I always go out of my way to ask if he is a banker or not.
SARCASM MODE OFF
. If the same greeting isn't returned I know we have a problem. Yeah, I understand yuo want to troll non white people, but some day this is not going to end well for you

@EuroGaNationalist: There are 7(?) Billion people on the planet, we just ignore stupid yanks, and move on with our lives, we got more things to do then your first world problem bullshit, luckily your country is going down the toilet economically so we wont have to bother about your retarded ideas anymore

@HereticVII: At the end of the day, truth is objective. Truth doesn’t depend on whether someone cares or not and that’s not how we should be basing society. Just like gender/sex, race is biological and biological realities must be treated as such. Your same logic can be used this way, you see a person who looks like a female (transgender woman) you treat them like a female because you don’t care about dna or male female chromosomes or anatomies. You hook up with a dude who looks like a chick. Does dna not matter than? Classifying people as what they are is crucial to a functioning society so people can better protect themselves and understand the people they are dealing with. A Nigerian American and an African American are very different, at least 400 years separated with African Americans descending from many non Nigerian populations like Bantus as well. It’s important to look and discuss these things to filter out a common denominator in African American low iq and impulsivity.

Well they’re not false equivalencies in this sense because the comparison was a comparison of biological realities. My point being that as gender is biological and I’m sure you believe that the genders are what they biologically are, and that we should identify people as what they actually are instead of social interpretation. What makes a woman a woman? It’s simple her biology. What makes an African American an African American? Their biology as well. So the comparison shows that you can’t class people based on social interpretation or your own beliefs. Now that same logic can be applied to race where we group people based on what they are which isn’t based on how they look or social perception but what they are genetically. Your genetics make up you which is why certain people are different from each other, it extends far more than skin color. Also in my video like I talk about in all of my videos, african Americans are not African. They descend from both africa and europe which makes them mixed and different from an actual African. You are focusing on terms and are neglecting the fact that they are part European which alters their genes in many ways. Also you said, “African dna.” There isn’t a thing called African dna. African dna is not a monolith it’s a highly genetically diverse continent with different races such as west Africans, Bantus, Afro asiatics, etc. That is actually a big point in my video, and I also posted a genetic diagram of African dna. Fact is an African American is not the same as a Nigerian, race can’t be socialized and when you socialize one thing, we go down a rabbit hole. African Americans primarily descend from bantu Africans in africa, a different race from west Africans. Sure they have some west African heritage but that’s less than their bantu heritage much like their European heritage, so it may sound like a shock to say this to someone who isn’t completely aware of genetic variation between populations but, they are more related to a White American due to common European ancestry not to distant vs a Nigerian from a very distant (over 400 years ago) west African ancestor, and again, their west African heritage is small compared to their bantu heritage. Also take into account that Bantus never accomplished or built anything, no empires, languages. West Africans differ even in this sense as west Africans have built the Mali, Timbuktu, Ghana, Songhai, Ashanti, etc empires. Being an African American is a lineage and they descend from a common group of people, that’s how ethnicities and races develop. They have been here and mixed with Europeans genetically over 400 years and developed their own culture and history based on their hybridized southern and bantu lineages. They are essentially their own people who are really just a mixed race breed in America. You also mention dna tests and downplayed the differences by saying it’s based off small variances but dna tests are only commercial and based off of limited reference samples. Even then african Americans aren’t even in the Nigerian reference samples because their dna off is ayes from a typical Nigerian. If you look at a PCs plot, it would be a better representation rather than percentages. At the end of the day, african Americans and Nigerians have different dna, cultures, histories, lineages, morals, and behaviors because they are different. My point with my race series is to show that our perceptions of race are only social and that they need to be biological based on inherit right, blood, and lineage.