famles sex workers are felling the heat of inflation MGTOW

PROMOTING FINANCIAL DEPENDENCE OF WOMEN ON MEN ...

promotes man slavery and divorce rape of men by women, something that the masculists are murderously opposed to.

@profhugodegaris: I hear an opinion, I don't hear any reasons why.

@profhugodegaris: "Murderously"? Normally I wouldn't care of the opinions of others. Are you vicariously trying to issue a death threat?

@Longshanks: https://profhugodegaris.wordpress.com Click on the Masculism tab for 660+ essays and their videos for the reasons.

@Longshanks: THE TWO MAIN ENEMIES OF THE MASCULISATS ARE ...

Fluffies and fluffie feminists, who are seen by masculists as man slaving, divorce raping, forced fathering, vermin, to be exterminated, by being totally ignored, not even pumped and dumped, forced to rot on the shelf, dying slow miserable deaths. Masculists are abolitionists, seeing man slavery as a war issue, and literally a thousand times bigger problem than was negro slavery in the US. Consider the fact, that one father in FOUR gets butchered in the hated fluffie feminist controlled divorce court system, ONE IN FOUR ! and maybe one pregnancy in ten involves paternity fraud, then you will begin to understand the murderous hatred of masculists towards their enemies, and the aim to exterminate them by totally ignoring them.

@profhugodegaris: I appreciate this explanation of your intense opinions. However I did not promote modern western marriage, replete with its divorce dungeons and other attrocities. I espoused a naturist opinion of living in harmony according to the nature of whom is in question: most of them prefer that avenue of employment anthropologically speaking. That means a few of them do not prefer to be such. All I said was those that did not want to be prostitutes should be kept in privacy (I don't know where you read divorce dungeons into this part), whereas the rest, that prefer to be whores, should be allowed to be financially independent persons by charging an upfront fee for their preferred professional services. You wouldn't want them to be fiscally-independent in this manner?