Responsive image

How To Trick Women Into Buying Love Dolls - MGTOW

313 Views
Sandman
Sandman
subs count
3,184
Published on 09 Aug 2020 / In People & Blogs

⁣Sponsor Link:
Surviving 4th Wave Feminism
https://amzn.to/3hu3Ai6

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lshzZhHAYIs

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Brave Browser: https://brave.com/san644


Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video isn't brought to you by anyone. I just had a great epiphany while having a conversation with everyone's favorite fat cat and she complained about love dolls for women and it inspired the evil genius in me. The chat and I chat on Skype occasionally and I know how much you guys love hearing from her. So what was this amazing insight that I received. Well she mentioned that their biggest problem, no pun intended was that there were two penis attachments. One that's flaccid and the other that's a fat boy standing to attention. My first thought was why didn't someone create an inflatable dong for a man doll? But then I thought about my system where you project a person into the doll that you interact with. What if a woman interacts with a man through the doll and when she turns him on he starts to get hard and on his end there's a device that resembles a flesh light that senses him filling it up and on her end the male member starts to inflate as a result. She would get rewarded by seeing him get turned on her by her twerking. Plus she can interact with him through the doll. But that's not where the super genius level trickery takes place. The more I thought about this the more it made sense from the standpoint of screwing over feminists. What if instead of creating a female version I made the male version first and marketed to women? The biggest issue with getting women to adopt such technology is that dolls won't work and provide for them like a real man. Plus they don't get the satisfaction of interacting with a human being by being with a regular type of doll. A nagasaurus after-all needs someone to nag. The man in the doll can be her real life Ken that she can literally manipulate. There's a psychological element because women are more interested in people on average while men are more generally interested in things. But not all men and not all women. So I thought what better way to introduce my virtual sex love bot system then to introduce it to the female market first. Then I would have plausible deniability that I wasn't trying to objectify women because I was objectifying men instead and no one cares about men so it's perfect. Men certainly won't complain about being objectified. If women adopted the technology then they couldn't complain about dolls for men being released because the technology was created for them. It wouldn't be fair if they were using it and men weren't allowed to use it. Men would see their attitude and behavior change and wonder what was going on. If they behaved badly they would risk revealing the darkness of female nature. Anyways, Before I discuss this more let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Surviving Fourth Wave Feminism: Anyways, now back to the video. The power in creating a virtual sex system where a woman interacts virtually with a man means that she can use the power of her vagina to create a robotic hard on right there in front of her by turning a
guy on that's on the other side of the world. It appeals to their vanity, narcissism and desire for attention. Plus they would pay men on the other side to entertain them. They also would no longer be able to complain that men were objectifying men with such technology because they were objectifying us first.







10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.

Video Motion Graphics Credits:
Particle Wave 4K Motion Background by "Videezy.com"

Sponsor Ad Photo Credits:

1. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-374272249/stoc

2. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-283288792/stoc

3. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-167018270/stoc

4. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-272336026/stoc

Show more
Responsive image

Log in to comment

HalfaBubbleOffPlumb
HalfaBubbleOffPlumb 4 years ago

There is a science of touch, it's called haptics.

   0    0
WindSage
WindSage 4 years ago

Haptic suits have been in development for a long while. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OEMa2-IVfyw I do remember a long time ago, this show about things being researched for the future. they were researching it so a subscriber would "touch" the performer. Seems it was too expensive or something but I can see it working in the current climate.

   0    0
ShadowMonk
ShadowMonk 4 years ago

Using women’s tools against them, That’s awesome and so extremely hilarious that I will barely imagine the look on a little miss slutshine’s face without laughing myself to death and pissing on myself. XD XD XD XD XD
https://www.seekpng.com/png/de....tail/153-1537043_mem

   0    0
ShadowMonk
ShadowMonk 4 years ago

Also another thing about feminism caused by feminism. https://pics.me.me/when-each-l....etter-is-a-mental-di

   0    0
MortRigo
MortRigo 4 years ago

The only standard that women have is the double standard. Women had dildos for a long time but they still complain about a fleshlight.

   1    0
snake_charmers_jj
snake_charmers_jj 4 years ago

6:06. Finally Sandman... a laugh ?? I’m loving it brother.

   0    0
Show more

0