profhugodegaris
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson
Sant77
David Icke
RT
Masculist with Dr. Hugo de Garis
5
0
84 Views
Published on 29 Apr 2021 / In
Science & Technology
The angrier and more bitter these women become at not finding a manslave to pay for them, given their traditional expectations of men as cash machines, the more they are attacked by the masculists, who are outraged by the massive gender injustice committed against men in the divorce courts, the lack of a Parer (paternity rejection right) etc. The fact that women have a Marer but men don’t have a Parer, screams of gender injustice, as well as the fact that men are seen by the law merely as cash machines for women.
Show more
0
Log in to comment
Great perspective from both lamphrey and Dr. Garis. Enjoyed the discussion. I am very interested this idea that Dr. Garis has about women "fipping up". The doc and lamphrey are both smart dudes but the average dude is just going to take the opportunity to get women when they are down. Women will fail to be able to provide for themselves in a severe scarcity situation, and then in addition they will not be able to out compete men so in a sense what is more likely to happen is they well begin to seek protection from harm, look for resources, and form a Harem type thing. For women to provide for themselves it would require men to act with an immense level of cooperation that has not been seen before. Like the doc says, the women in a sense are community property now, they have captured the body politic and have used to to steal productivity from men. If this system fails they will just revert back to the old way where they are essentially property of men which is a better arrangement. I doubt we will ever see a world where women perform and are as accountable as men on average, just isn't going to happen. They will become prostitutes or property of men again if the system breaks. Just my view.
also global warming is BS, the civil war due to slavery is also nonsense, all reification. This person is a professor, he has been in the education/university system so long he is buying into almost all the liberal topics. There is no such thing as as replacement rate, the 2.1 rate is ontological nonsense, either you are expanding population with 4 - 7 kids like it used to be or you are just waiting to be conquered and exterminated, same as it ever was. he abolitionist movement was also all astroturfed, all financed to destabilize the country. Just like the suffragists.
ok, using these terms like fluffer, the guest doesnt understand that its top down, unless you have heavy media promotion, these type of social pressure movements cant work cause it always was astroturfed to begin with. Also, promoting equality is wrong since we are not equal, more egalitarian nonsense ideology from the enlightenment age which was complete nonsense to remove monarchies and create democracies.
please add his links to the description