Nikola Tesla Was Wrong About Women - MGTOW

⁣Sponsor Link:
Surviving 4th Wave Feminism
https://amzn.to/3hu3Ai6

https://anengineersaspect.blog....spot.com/2011/07/nik

Mystery Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fjPRwMbwjAE

Odysee.TV: https://odysee.com/@SandmanMGTOW:c
Bitchute Link: https://www.bitchute.com/channel/YIxeDBpkwsLT/

SubscribeStar.com: https://www.subscribestar.com/sandman

Paypal / Email: Sandmanmgtow @ Gmail.com

Bitcoin Address: bc1qtkeru8ygglfq36eu544hxw6n9hsh22l7fkf8uv


Hi Everyone Sandman Here,

This video is brought to you by a donation from Istvan and here's what he has to say: "Hi Sandman, By now there are a large number of very rich women in the world, de facto billionaires (Mrs. Bezos worth $40 billion). But the prevailing narrative in the MSM and academia is that women cannot progress in STEM subjects because of patriarchy and toxic masculinity and the lack of role models for women and girls. If that is true, and most women seem to believe this, why not challenge these very rich women, whose total wealth must be in the trillions of dollars, to establish and fund and all-female STEM university? With a staff, faculty and students all female. I am sure even governments would contribute. In time then the graduates of this university could come up with scientific and technological discoveries and innovations free of male dominance, ridicule and oppression. Let their contribution stand on its own merits!" unquote. Nikola Tesla once thought the the way that you did when he claimed that women would astonish the world at their progress and rival men one day. He was right right about most other things when it comes to women working in Stem. But not that. So why did he reach the conclusion that you did that women could stand on their own merits? His mother was also an inventor and he credits his intellect coming from him. She would be one of that small percentage of incredible and extraordinary women that are high in trait openness and also industrious. That was his bias while growing up and probably believed that many women could be as productive and creative as she was. But she was an outlier and not the
standard. Outlier females still have the same base instincts. But they might be better at controlling them or their creativity supersedes their desire to breed and control men. I've seen that. The drive to be creative is stronger than the other urges. There is also the issue of IQ. There is a tiny fraction of a percent of women that are high in trait openness with high IQ that are also logical and in stem. If you want to see that reality that you speak of Istvan then you need to take their eggs. Tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of them and impregnate surrogate mothers with them and that way you can boost the number of high creativity and high IQ women in your soyciety. The rise of the Superwoman. Pay the surrogates, hire the nannies and then you'll have the female stock ready for one of those all female universities you speak of. I'll discuss more in a moment but let me first tell everyone about today's sponsor Surviving 4th Wave Feminism:





10 images licensed and paid for through BigStock.com. All image licenses are available upon request.

Video Motion Graphics Credits:
Particle Wave 4K Motion Background by "Videezy.com"

Sponsor Ad Photo Credits:

1. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-374272249/stoc

2. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-283288792/stoc

3. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-167018270/stoc

4. https://www.bigstockphoto.com/....image-272336026/stoc