Recognizing and Challenging Facial Recognition Technology in Criminal Cases

10 Views

ErickRendoza 204
subs count

Published on 24 Jul 2023 / In Film & Animation

Panel: Recognizing and Challenging Facial Recognition Technology in Criminal Cases

Panelists: Clare Garvie, Associate, Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown University Law Center; Kaitlin Jackson, Attorney, Bronx Defenders; Joshua Kroll, Postdoctoral Research Scholar, UC Berkeley School of Information

“It’s Complicated: Combatting the Surveillance State in Criminal Proceedings” was co-sponsored by NACDL and the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology (BCLT), and held at The International House from November 29-30, 2018.

2 Comments

To live chat and super chat you must login.

sbseed 1 year ago

also it does not have more than a certain number of points on the face... the whole thing is complete bullshit.

0 0

sbseed 1 year ago

measurements i mean, it can recognize people who are not actually criminals as being criminals because it lacks the ability to accurately recognize specific identifying characteristics. therefore it cannot legally be used in court.

0 0

sbseed 1 year ago

same thing as a 'polygraph' test.

0 0

sbseed 1 year ago

against the constitution and is illegal... maybe we should start cutting down cameras.

0 0

ErickRendoza 204 1 year ago

BB Gun or laser i was told it works those small cat lasers... also a cheap night vision will show at night cameras you do not see on posts by the police. Today they can install a light bulb camera and operate it remotely with wi fi on and off.

1 0

Up next

Recognizing and Challenging Facial Recognition Technology in Criminal Cases

Up next

Please note that if you are under 18, you won't be able to access this site.

Up next

Recognizing and Challenging Facial Recognition Technology in Criminal Cases

Up next