Seriously, I'm tired of red flags

Looking forward to your "green flags" videos, huMAN.

I live in the US and I agree with ( John_Doe ) Below comment- There is a glass of clean water in the Ocean But you will choke and Drown before you find it - Until the Many Laws change in the family courts and the power women use against Men given by the state remains the same ! It will be safer for Men to NOT play the game ! - Just stay a MGTOW my Brothers ! !

I'll open by saying I agree with your underlying premise with regard to too much focus on negativity. For a philosophy, movement, whatever that calls itself Men Going Their Own Way, there appears to me an inordinate amount of time and (negative) energy expended on women; what they think, how they behave, what they've done, what they've failed to do, etc., etc., etc. A little more "Going Their Own Way" and a little less "Dwelling On The Past" would be healthier in my estimation.

However, I understand why when viewed through the lens of the Five Stages of Grief model; men recently hurt by a woman and their eyes recently opened to MGTOW / Red Pill / hypergamy / gynocentrism are naturally going to experience a phase of anger. It's necessary, healthy, and cathartic. There's also value in men who - despite having already passed through that stage - continue creating content about it because there are always new men coming to the ranks of MGTOW / Red Pill who need to be informed, who need a guide through these turbulent waters. And social media being what it is - for better or for worse - new content must be perpetually created, even if it's the same message over and over, for it to float to the top of algorithms and find its way to these men.

That said, there exist distinct socio-political, cultural, and legal differences which must be taken into account which have very real-world potential consequences on how one interacts with women in their native country. I'll beg your pardon if the following assumption is incorrect; however, I'm going to assume you're in Australia or New Zealand. Both nations have severely curtailed firearms ownership. Thus, that variable has largely been removed from the equation of male-female interactions. Not so in the USA. Allow me to explain:

Firearms ownership is quite widespread throughout the USA; there's AT LEAST one firearm for every man, woman, and child. However, with 50 individual states, there are as many variations on gun laws as there are states. A commonality among those which take a dim view towards firearms ownership are the existence of Red Flag Laws / Extreme Risk Protection Orders; there's also an effort to institute the same on a national level. These "laws" (wholly unconstitutional, by the way, as they directly violate several amendments contained in our federal Constitution) empower the state to confiscate firearms from an owner ex parte and without any evidence of a threat to harm self or others. Merely on the attestation of someone who "feels" a threat exists (again, even in the absence of evidence) is enough for a judge to issue a warrant and the police to serve that warrant without the firearms owner even aware the process has been initiated against them.

Initially these requests for a warrant could only be initiated by a law enforcement officer or an immediate family member. However, over the last few years, we've witnessed a creeping expansion of the list of authorized individuals who can lodge a report in some states: doctors, counselors, teachers, employers, co-workers, and significant others (to include non-married domestic partners). I think you can begin to appreciate where this is headed.

Add to that a push at the Federal level to raise domestic violence misdemeanor charges to the level of disqualifying an individual from purchasing a firearm (currently only ex-felons and those adjudicated mentally disabled are so barred). I think you're more than aware of how often false accusations of domestic violence are levied against men by their female partners. Furthermore, there is an effort to eliminate the statute of limitations from such accusations. In other words, if they get their way, the government will be able to disenfranchise an individual of their right to keep and bear arms, and even confiscate arms if they already own them, merely on false allegations and with no recourse by the individual; even if those allegations are made by a disgruntled and spiteful ex-partner from 25 years ago!

So, in the USA at least, if a man exercises his right to keep and bear arms, there hangs over his head the ever-present threat that a female partner (and even an ex-partner from years ago) - empowered by the state through the mechanisms described above - can bear false witness, leading to that man's rights violated without forewarning or opportunity to defend himself in court until after the confiscation and infringements have occurred. Obviously this will carry with it additional complications beyond simply the confiscation of arms. He will be investigated by law enforcement, demonized on social media, he may lose his job, he will have to bear considerable personal expense to fight the infringements in court, etc.

This makes every relationship with a woman fraught with significant risk as they become yet another conduit through which the state seeks to disarm the American population. In this context and for a gun-owning male, no romantic relationship with a woman is safe. They are a red flag because of the existence of these abominable Red Flag laws. Thus the only rational response, if one values their liberty, is to have nothing to do with any of them. Much like divorce, it's a case of AWALT; they may not exercise the option, but every woman has the capacity to exercise it if she chooses. That's not a risk I'm willing to take.

It is a sad state of affairs because you're damned if you do, damned if you don't. Implementing the only sane response (total disengagement) itself plays into the hands of those who would see the West depopulated. With men avoiding women entirely over a legitimate fear of how they've been weaponized against men, birth rates plummet below replacement level. Demographics drives destiny.

Susie and her PooTube => that shit hole of indoctrination smells of success, if there ever was one that could.