Some Truth About ECO Activists

Could the "Common Denominator"/"Underlying Motivation" with "Toxic Ecologists", "Toxic Wokist", "Toxic Communist", etc. be rooted in an individual's innate desire to impose their will upon that of another, which reaches "Critical Mass" when enough people team-up to bully others?

That Peroni must be good? you spelled Activist wrong! lol! Peroni is a bit to expensive for my taste!

I noticed the Wall hitter Councillor was on her own in that picture. I read that Just Stop Oil is a government backed thing where they all get £400 a shot for turning up when requested at a protest. Most of them are elderly NIMBY types with nothing better to do, probably the kid's with old HIPPY parent's. Personally I think they are just like a fly that interrupt' you dinner and should be treated accordingly. In fact the reality is Just stopping Oil is totally impossible and never likely to happen, we are to ingrained with it in society. I'm old and although healthy I don't think most of this CRAP is gonna effect my life, hasn't to date. Just to be a pain I will drive a few hundred yards to a Sgop, never used to but now I do as one a protest and to use my vehicle whilst I can. Mind you I do have a Chinese tricycle and a couple of bikes kept well prepared in my shed! lol! Global warming is a money making Myth, and the color GREEN has become a VERY, VERY dirty color today.

A case of pathologized compassion.

There was a time when women worried about things like Saber-Toothed Tigers eating their kids or whether there'd be enough Mammoth steaks to make it to the end of the week before they start going hungry. These were legitimate concerns; real, immediate, and truly life-or-death. Women evolved in this brutal world to be highly attuned to danger and acutely aware of their children's needs.

Fast-forward several tens of thousands of years to modern civilization where - for all practical intents and purposes - nothing threatens the human species anymore. We have all the food, clothing, shelter, comfort, recreation, safety, disposable time and income we could ever want when compared to our forebears.

But our DNA hasn't changed. We evolved as savages seeing danger lurking in every shadow and around every corner. With all the threats removed, though, there's no outlet for our evolutionary adaptations. We're anxious, nervous wrecks - women most of all - if we don't have something to fear or be concerned for. So what happens? WE INVENT THINGS TO WORRY ABOUT!

That's exactly where women are at today. Too much compassion, too few targets who are legitimately in danger to direct it at. So they become the useful idiots, the dupes, the pawns, the unwitting proxies of men who have figured out how to weaponize women's hair-trigger sense of danger and overwrought compassion in the service of destroying existing power structures in the hopes those men can elevate themselves to a position of rule.

We never evolved to exist in a world where we have so much of what we need handed to us with so little effort while simultaneously eliminating any real threat to our survival (save our self-inflicted threats). With no natural outlet for our innate inclinations, they become corrupted in the service of puppet masters pulling the emotional strings behind the scenes. And women are more easily manipulated in this regard than men.

Civilization may be serially sustainable, but not absolutely sustainable; it's not our natural state of being. Thus do empires rise and fall, over, and over, and over, and over...

They are terrorists they just haven't blown anyone up yet.