What on earth happened? Flattening the curve

Well... I have some experience in heights. I'm not a flat earther, let me get that clear. 12 floors, that means 30 something meters high, if you get two strings with a weight at the end, you'll get two vertical lines which are perfectly parallel. You can say 30m is not relevant, but how high do those columns you mentioned go?

@The Man Inside: not thirty meter's I think, maybe more like ten or fifteen.

@Councilof1: could it be a design feature or a mistake?

@The Man Inside: I think they designed it that way. So the plillars of the temple, I believe it's the temple of Athena, look straight from a distance.

@Councilof1: I'm not familiar with that building. One thing I'm 100% sure. The elders knew much more than we know now. Intelligence is lower and lower every day. We are probably the stupidest humans have ever been.

@The Man Inside: I believe it was intentional, & a sign of their architectural skill, from what I remember hearing

@The Man Inside: I'm pretty much convinced.The ballers don't really provide any simple arguments and the FEers provide endless ones. We also have our own direct lived everyday experience, every one of us. There are some other big lies that come to mind that we were all assiduously taught to think in lockstep. When you realize 'someone' is trying so hard to obfuscate one area of truth, it gets easier to consider other possibilities.

@TripeSwing: where I live there are many ancient monuments. The so called star forts, some have underwent "maintenance work". The original walls are perfectly straight, the walls that had work done are anything but straight. Hundreds of years later with modern technology and we can't do as good as a job as they did back then.

@TripeSwing: I have many, many questions. One is very relevant: How can I see Venus in the night sky? Two: How the fuck can I see stars through the moon? The moon being a solid ball, I should never see through it, regardless I can all of the moon or not. I thought this was shit talk until I saw it myself.

@The Man Inside: I don't see why some people get so upset about the subject. I'll apply the same reason as I do the simulation argument, which is if we're in a simulation, well all the same rules still apply really. But people get so upset that it leads me to think the FErs are right

@The Man Inside: It just makes alot of sense, every vid I watch, even 5 hour ones. Fully well explained, better than the ballers do

@TripeSwing: I bumped into this over a year ago. When it happened my thought was "Oh... These flat earth fuck ups". Now, I really have a hard time believing what I wad taught for decades. I have a very good long distance vision, I can see with my eyes ships I shouldn't, without a P900/P1000... How can that be explained?

@The Man Inside: yeah, I came around pretty easily after a vid or two. the 8 hour 'What on Earth Happened?' vid is good. Whatever doesn't sink into the pocket quite readily is good food for thought. I keep thinking as I watch such vids: "no lies detected", and I'm not that smart or invested in the argument ego wise. I'm happy to be wrong about anything if someone in good faith can prove it to me.

@TripeSwing: People get upset because they (we) hate to be wrong. You probably don't remember this, I had a motorcycle that at the time was all the rage, and I sold it. On forums I was telling people the reality about the bike, I had one, bought new, and was selling it. People went ballistic on my for saying what they didn't want to hear. They agreeing with me would mean they were wrong too, they made a not so good decision. People don't like to admit it.

@TripeSwing: Well, satellites... How can satellites be balloons? Satellite dishes are finely tuned, I know, I installed hundreds. A couple millimetres off and it won't work, if not touched, it will capture signal for decades. A balloon will not be stationary. FE claims that satellite dishes point to ground emitters. Not true. I installed one about ten meters off a wall roughly also 10 tall. That building would block any ground signals, yet it is working flawlessly for 3 years now. Flat earth doesn't explain this. No matter how much I scratch my head, I can't understand how would it work on FE.

@The Man Inside: yeah, they're bound a get a thing or two wrong

@TripeSwing: The moon land hoax, the imaginary space station, are easy to understand, are fake. Satellites are most likely fiction too. How to explain the signal the dishes catch, i can't explain. The explanations FE people give, are not in line with my personal experience. Even me having an open mind.

@The Man Inside: maybe you'll be the one to crack that nut then. Knowers are the ones that help remedy mistakes.

@TripeSwing: I would need to have access to transmitter stations. I know how copper and fiber communications work, how those stations work. Never worked on cell towers though. Was never near a "satellite". Only know how it works on the receiving end, and I'm not that knowledgeable to crack something this big.

@TripeSwing: The technical side is what FE people lack. These equipments need a lot of cooling, fans and air conditioning machines are a must, otherwise the electronics fry. In space there's no air. How are "Satellites" being cooled? "Satellites" would need batteries, again, that need to be heated, cooled, AND replaced. Technically "satellites" make no sense. Balloons floating on air don't make sense either.

@The Man Inside: solar powered rigs? but idk. have you seen the vids of satellites on balloons crashing, one taking out a van and a small building?

@TripeSwing: Ah, yes, solar panels to charge the batteries and run the thing when facing the sun, but geostationary "Satellites" experience "night" too. Hence the batteries. Yes, I've seen the "weather balloons". Probably spy sataloons as the ones Google uses. My only question is the so called geostationary ones. Because I know those don't move at all.