Responsive image

Als nächstes


13 SCIENCE LIES YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD

62 Ansichten
Veröffentlicht auf 08 Mar 2025 / Im Film & Animation

update

Zeig mehr
Responsive image

Log in to comment

WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 29 Tage vor

No dumbass. #13 is wrong. What you see as flat is the horizon, the further out you go or higher up past the outer atmosphere the more curvature you see then. Otherwise, good video and mostly true.

To top it off all babies under one year old should never get vaccines. All their immune systems are not developed until one year old-- the immune system of their mothers works from the breast milk to protect them. Always breast feed your kids... just watch the milk producers diet... you don't want to poison the kid do you?

   1    0
Leader_Desslok
Leader_Desslok 1 Monat vor

i think that "Flat Earters" are just sad losers that are just looking to blame " Da Man " for their failure to thrive in the technological age. it goes like this " The government lied about the earth being a globe , therefore it is flat ". this is an excuse to give up on life and live in mommy's basement forever .

   2    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 29 Tage vor

They don't understan perspective or the horizon... such a lost cause...

   1    0
Leader_Desslok
Leader_Desslok 1 Monat vor

ok so when someone with a degree in science and a background in maths has also done a halo jump from 33,000 feet they can talk to me about "flat earth". also when did we establish that the lenses in satellites were "fish eye lens "? the flat earth tards all say this and yet offer zero evidence for this claim. just for fun when some flat earth tard starts in with their bullshit , ask them to explain the "coriolis effect " . you see this is proven science . also this effect will not work on a "flat earth". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force . here are the most common satellite lens on the market . now one of them is a "fish eye lens . https://blog.satsearch.co/2020....-03-25-optical-paylo

   1    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

Yeah - as a professional troller of trolls, the other part of this issue is the human habit of trying to make up the grandest possible tall tales (outright lies) and to rope people into arguments, simply for the fun of watching them go extremely insane and get flustered trying to come up with counter arguments to dispell the bullshit of outright lies.... I mean this can be fun. I don't do it. Bu there are some good arguments put forward from each side..... with varying degrees of outright bullshit and people going insane.... as well as some people seem to be trying to fuck with society - like the moon landings were fake etc..

   2    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

The Halo Jump from 33,000 Feet. Well I was the one who pushed Joseph KIttinger out the gondala at 31,300 meters. I was dressed in some shorts and sandles, and he was in a space suit to fool the people into thinking that there is no air in space. I can assure you there is air all the way to the moon and to the end of the universe. If there wasn't, the suns being carbon based, would go out. I stepped out of the gondola at 200,000 meters, after some nice English tea and scones with whipped cream and strawberry jam.... https://upload.wikimedia.org/w....ikipedia/commons/thu https://i.pinimg.com/736x/3f/0....e/01/3f0e011eeb05fbd

   2    0
Leader_Desslok
Leader_Desslok 1 Monat vor

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: Shane , thanks for the update ! how could i have been so misinformed ? i wish i had been there to get some of those legendary English tea and scones with whipped cream and strawberry jam! now i'm hungry ! thanks a lot mate ! BTW when is studied physics at uni we were told that the stars were fuled by nuclear fusion . the idea that the sun needs oxygen to burn is absurd. the fusion of hydrogen onto helium is just the beginning of the whole cascade fusion process that creates all the other elements. also you can tell the trolls that there is NO FIRE happening on the sun . fire is far too cold to support yhe temperatures on the sun .

   2    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

@Leader_Desslok: The actual sun and all the other stars are made of black coal and they burn in the oxygen of space.... it's the size of the fire that makes them so hot - it's a sort of exponential cubed calculation that everytime you increase a fires mass by a cubic measurement - from 1 to 9 to 125 - the temperature also rises proportionally - And although Max Plank - one of my better students, came up with some interesting ideas, ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_constant ) all the other scientists, couldn't understand that once the limit of temperature had been reached, it failed to account completely for where the temperature has exceeded the maximum possible temperature and is actually cooling back down to the maximum temperature.... This is the mystery of UN-Dark Matter. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature - Peak temperature for a bulk quantity of matter was achieved by a pulsed-power machine used in fusion physics experiments. The term bulk quantity draws a distinction from collisions in particle accelerators wherein high temperature applies only to the debris from two subatomic particles or nuclei at any given instant. The >2 GK temperature was achieved over a period of about ten nanoseconds during shot Z1137. In fact, the iron and manganese ions in the plasma averaged 3.58±0.41 GK (309±35 keV) for 3 ns (ns 112 through 115). Ion Viscous Heating in a Magnetohydrodynamically Unstable Z Pinch at Over 2×109 Kelvin, M.G. Haines et al., Physical Review Letters 96 (2006) 075003. Link to Sandia's news release. Archived 2010-05-30 at the Wayback Machine Core temperature of a high–mass (>8–11 solar masses) star after it leaves the main sequence on the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram and begins the alpha process (which lasts one day) of fusing silicon–28 into heavier elements in the following steps: sulfur–32 → argon–36 → calcium–40 → titanium–44 → chromium–48 → iron–52 → nickel–56. Within minutes of finishing the sequence, the star explodes as a Type II supernova. Citation: Holland, Arthur; Williams, Mark. "Stellar Evolution: The Life and Death of Our Luminous Neighbors". GS265. University of Michigan. Archived from the original on 2009-01-16. More informative links can be found here "Chapter 21 Stellar Explosions". Archived from the original on 2013-04-11. Retrieved 2016-02-08., and here "Trans". Archived from the original on 2011-08-14. Retrieved 2016-02-08., and a concise treatise on stars by NASA is here "NASA - Star". Archived from the original on 2010-10-24. Retrieved 2010-10-12..

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

about 100 million million million million million degrees Certain cosmological models, including the one that has held sway for decades, the Standard Model, posit a theoretical highest temperature. It's called the Planck temperature, after the German physicist Max Planck, and it equals about 100 million million million million million degrees, or 1032 Kelvin. You see most scientists are not that bright - but I am. So when your REAL temperature is 100 million million million million million degrees to the power of 100,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000 and it starts cooling down.... well it takes quite a while. This explains the average temperature of the observed universe. The universe should stabilise after some time, to the actual Planck Temperature evenutally - and we will all die from overheating and combustion.

   0    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 29 Tage vor

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: Ah... Trolling, Trolling on an internet stream, fucking with these is fun and my dream.... now if only I csn remember the notes for row row your boat... I could simg this or make AI do it...

   0    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 29 Tage vor

@Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson: I was going to say what a dumbass. He left a perfectly good breakfast behind... He knows it's a long way down, right? High Altitude Low Orbit-- Hey, where's Master Chief? I thought he lived for this shit?

   0    0
WMHarrison94
WMHarrison94 29 Tage vor

@Leader_Desslok: No. The s un hasca fiery atmosphere-- that's the corona...yhe tjing that gotvEinstein his uhm Nobel Prize... or was that the photoelectric effect? If you point a telescope at the sun on a clear day and put a white pape under the eyepiece, you can see its fiery atmospherr dance across the page. If you're dtupid, look at it and go blind.

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

@WMHarrison94: I don't engage with the Flat Earthers - but the arguments between them and non believers - on occassion - SOME of them are actually very good... Sort of like a university debate between kind of believable bullshit artists who are telling the biggest semi plausable, absolutely outrageous lies, Vs. the head cases who are going purple with rage and their heads are exploding. Genuinely GOOD lying - like telling tall tales, about anything really, for legitimate entertainment - is a GOOD thing. Did I ever tell you about the day I caught a fish that was SO huge it took over 200 men to pull it into the dingy? What an incredible catch. I even have a photograpth to prove it. https://exhibit-production-dig....italcommons.s3.amazo

   0    0
Life_N_Times_of_Shane_T_Hanson

@WMHarrison94: IF you look around for very special satellite images of the sun ------- FUCK.... I am exasperated with the excitement and just how incredible the images are. And the technology that has been developed to do it.

   0    0
sbseed
sbseed 1 Monat vor

all the but the last one are true, flat earthers are retards that do not understand how oxygen and hydrogen act like a lens themselves as well as if the camera is housed inside of a container that is at a lower atmospheric level than the atmospheric level of where the picture is taken... the same way a window in a bows outward in an aircraft and causes the flat skyline effect...

it is possible that the earth could be a different shape than what mainstream science says it is (after all they are wrong or lie about most things anyways), which it would most-likely more accurate to say the earth is ovoid maybe, but in all the explanations from the flat earthers they have not taken into account any of the natural phenomenon that comes from the atmosphere and other external influences on what is being seen or seem to show from any given picture of the skyline (should also include the earths magnetic field in that as well really)...

if they are able to negate all of the effects that happen and can prove that nothing has effected the pictures taken to make it look flat then i would be willing to take them more seriously...
everything else has already been proven, taking into account most if not all variables..

   1    0
Zeig mehr

0

Als nächstes