13 SCIENCE LIES YOU HAVE BEEN TOLD
6
0
62 Ansichten
Veröffentlicht auf 08 Mar 2025 / Im
Film & Animation
update
Zeig mehr
0
Log in to comment
No dumbass. #13 is wrong. What you see as flat is the horizon, the further out you go or higher up past the outer atmosphere the more curvature you see then. Otherwise, good video and mostly true.
To top it off all babies under one year old should never get vaccines. All their immune systems are not developed until one year old-- the immune system of their mothers works from the breast milk to protect them. Always breast feed your kids... just watch the milk producers diet... you don't want to poison the kid do you?
i think that "Flat Earters" are just sad losers that are just looking to blame " Da Man " for their failure to thrive in the technological age. it goes like this " The government lied about the earth being a globe , therefore it is flat ". this is an excuse to give up on life and live in mommy's basement forever .
ok so when someone with a degree in science and a background in maths has also done a halo jump from 33,000 feet they can talk to me about "flat earth". also when did we establish that the lenses in satellites were "fish eye lens "? the flat earth tards all say this and yet offer zero evidence for this claim. just for fun when some flat earth tard starts in with their bullshit , ask them to explain the "coriolis effect " . you see this is proven science . also this effect will not work on a "flat earth". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coriolis_force . here are the most common satellite lens on the market . now one of them is a "fish eye lens . https://blog.satsearch.co/2020....-03-25-optical-paylo
all the but the last one are true, flat earthers are retards that do not understand how oxygen and hydrogen act like a lens themselves as well as if the camera is housed inside of a container that is at a lower atmospheric level than the atmospheric level of where the picture is taken... the same way a window in a bows outward in an aircraft and causes the flat skyline effect...
it is possible that the earth could be a different shape than what mainstream science says it is (after all they are wrong or lie about most things anyways), which it would most-likely more accurate to say the earth is ovoid maybe, but in all the explanations from the flat earthers they have not taken into account any of the natural phenomenon that comes from the atmosphere and other external influences on what is being seen or seem to show from any given picture of the skyline (should also include the earths magnetic field in that as well really)...
if they are able to negate all of the effects that happen and can prove that nothing has effected the pictures taken to make it look flat then i would be willing to take them more seriously...
everything else has already been proven, taking into account most if not all variables..